The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: which articles were violated by @Univalle_FSalud?

Articles violated by those who planned and executed my forced psychiatric treatment (December 8, 2014)

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Article 3.

  • Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person

Article 5.

  • No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 8.

  • Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

  • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

  • Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 12.

  • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 18.

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

“Whistleblowing”: a health issue. BMJ 1993;307:667-70

…”Forcing whistleblowers to see psychiatrists in order to discredit them, usually as having a personality disorder that could account for their irrational obsession with malpractice, is reminiscent of Soviet misuse of psychiatry. If the first psychiatrist’s report is unhelpful the subject can be forced to see another until the desired result is achieved. This practice is clearly unethical: coercion invalidates consent. (The personalities of the subjects in this study were not unusual, but nearly half were of the sensing, thinking, perceiving type (about 12% of the population), which is considered to be particularly suited to quality control or accountancy.)”… — Jean Lennane.


The Russian Concept of Schizophrenia: A Review of the Literature

…“For the first time in the history of science, nonprofessional politicians started telling scientists how to do the “right kind of science,” and anything other than the right kind was pronounced wrong.”…  —  Helen Lavretsky. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1998

http://schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/4/537.full.pdf


“A totally honest organization would never hide or disguise actions or stonewall.” — Brian Martin


No answers yet.

Related Information

Whistleblowers and psychiatrists (I)

Whistleblowers and psychiatrists (II)

Expectation vs. Reality

Ethos

Whistleblowing – what protection do employees have?

What is political abuse of psychiatry? 

Science Quote: Richard P. Feynman

Why the silence?

In memoriam – Dr Jean Lennane.

  8 comments for “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: which articles were violated by @Univalle_FSalud?

  1. March 8, 2015 at 4:53 am

    Reblogged this on Chaos Theory and Human Pharmacology and commented:

    “Psychiatric incarceration of mentally healthy people is uniformly understood to be a particularly pernicious, form of repression, because it uses the powerful modalities of medicine as tools of punishment, and it compounds a deep affront to human rightswith deception and fraud. Doctors who allow themselves to be used in this way (certainly as collaborators, but even as victims of intimidation) betray the trust of society and breach their most basic ethical obligations as professionals.” (1)

    References

    1. Richard Bonnie. Political Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union and in China: Complexities and Controversies. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2002; 30:136–44.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: