“The Case Against Essure” ―By @kevinpflug | ―@ClassAction_org

The Case Against Essure

“Normally, when a company sells a defective product, those who have been injured may file lawsuits seeking compensation for the harm they have suffered. For women who have experienced serious medical complications because of the birth control device Essure, the courthouse doors have been closed. A legal doctrine known as federal preemption has prevented injured patients from filing lawsuits against Bayer, the maker of the medical device.” – Kevin Pflug
Read the full-text article via ClassAction.org

Acknowledgements to Angie Firmalino for sharing this information with me.

 Related post: Essure –Happy New Year Bayer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: