1- I’m sorry but your arguments are all the opposite to the evidence
2- Your viewpoints are supported by the repetitive use of several fallacies.
3- Are you trying to create a debate solely with a survey plus an incorrect appraisal of the evidence?
The title sounds like a troll, but I will make it precise and document it with more than two dozen citations below, each linked. The precise statement will be falsifiable by a comment if I’m wrong.
The last few years I’ve come to realize that much of what I always implicitly thought true, is in fact a mirage, and come to understand much about why the world is the very different way it is, and something about how we might all better reach enlightenment. I hope to explain this in some technical detail, and in return spark comments that enlighten me. I will begin with an example in the field of medical science, but examples in other fields will follow later, as well as discussion of why such crazy examples exist, and general first principle discussions in natural philosophy. By natural philosophy I mean the methods and rationality of physics…
View original post 4,016 more words