“It’s actually a very unpleasant experience to read a Nature paper, or
to read a Science paper,” — Randy Schekman.
2. I would add papers published in other Journals (e.g., N Engl J Med) and the vast majority of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) describing erroneous recommendations for the treatment of several human diseases (e.g., ATP III, JNC7-8, ESC guidelines, etc). Many recommendations in these CPG are not supported by real data (i.e., evidence) because competing interests of the author’s or – probably worst – the phenomenon of ghostwriting.